NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Ironlaw Pty Ltd v Wollondilly Shire Council (No 2) [2013] NSWLEC 146 Hearing dates: 8 April 2013 Decision date: 10 September 2013 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Craig J Decision: 1. The respondent's notice of motion filed on 1 February 2013 is dismissed. 2. Costs reserved. 3. List the matter for further directions before the Registrar on Friday 13 September 2013. 4. Exhibit A may be returned. Catchwords: PROCEDURE - summary dismissal of an appeal under s 97(1)(b) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EPA Act) - development application not accompanied by an environmental impact statement - application identified as being for designated development only after commencement of the appeal - whether absence of an environmental impact statement at the time of commencing appeal rendered the appeal incompetent - whether reliance could be placed upon s 82(1) of the EPA Act - whether development application had been 'lodged' so as to engage cl 113 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 (the Regulation) - significance of consent authority's entitlement to reject application under cl 51 of the Regulation - operation of the assessment period and 'stop-the-clock' provisions in the Regulation - whether the Court could make a nunc pro tunc order in respect of the appeal Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Cases Cited: Amacon Pty Ltd v Concord Municipal Council, (Hemmings J, 2 December 1987, unreported) Botany Bay City Council v Remath Investments No. 6 Pty Ltd [2000] NSWCA 364; (2000) 50 NSWLR 312 Building Recyclers Investments Pty Ltd v Marrickville Council [2003] NSWLEC 331; (2003) 131 LGERA 413 Carey v Australian Broadcasting Corporation [2012] NSWCA 176; (2012) 290 ALR 348 Cranky Rock Road Action Group Inc & Anor v Cowra Shire Council & Ors [2006] NSWCA 339; (2006) 150 LGERA 81 Currey v Sutherland Shire Council [2002] NSWLEC 195 Currey v Sutherland Shire Council [2003] NSWCA 300; (2003) 129 LGERA 223 Helman v Byron Shire Council (1995) 87 LGERA 349 McGovern v Ku-ring-gai Council [2008] NSWCA 209; (2008) 72 NSWLR 504 Rose Bay Marina Pty Ltd v Minister for Urban Affairs and Planning [2002] NSWLEC 123; (2002) 122 LGERA 255 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Ironlaw Pty Limited (Applicant) Wollondilly Shire Council (Respondent) Representation: T G Howard (Applicant) A E Galasso SC (Respondent) Shaw Reynolds Lawyers Pty Ltd (Applicant) Marsdens Law Group (Respondent) File Number(s): 10920 of 2012
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate