NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Shankar v The Uniting Church in Australia; Shankar v Domino's Pizza Enterprises Limited (No 2) [2013] NSWSC 1323 Hearing dates: Written submissions Decision date: 13 September 2013 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Hidden J Decision: Plaintiff to pay 2nd defendant's costs Catchwords: COSTS - plaintiff successful against 1 of 2 defendants - whether Bullock or Sanderson order appropriate Legislation Cited: Workers Compensation Act 1987 Cases Cited: - Gould v Vaggelas (1985) 157 CLR 215 Texts Cited: - Grljak v Trivan Pty Ltd [1996] NSWCA 233 Category: Costs Parties: Vinay Shankar (plaintiff) The Uniting Church in Australia Property Trust (NSW) t/as Vision Valley Conference & Recreation Centre (1st defendant) Domino's Pizza Enterprises Limited t/as Domino's Pizza (2nd defendant) Domino's Pizza Enterprises Limited t/as Domino's Pizza (cross-claimant) The Uniting Church of Australia Property Trust (NSW) t/as Vision Valley Conference and Recreation Centre (cross-defendant) Representation: Counsel: AJ Lidden SC with JM Fraser (plaintiff) S Torrington (1st defendant) PN Khandhar (2nd defendant) Solicitors: Robert Bryden, Bryden's Law Office (plaintiff) Gillian Davidson, Sparke Helmore (1st defendant) Samuel Kennedy, TurksLegal (2nd defendant) File Number(s): 2009/29762; 2009/29760
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate