NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: JMK v RDC and PTO v WDO [2013] NSWSC 1362 Hearing dates: 19 September 2013 Decision date: 19 September 2013 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Lindsay J Decision: 1. Declarations and Orders made under s 41(1)(a) of the NSW Trustee and Guardian Act 2009 NSW. 2. Reservation of applications for the appointment of a private manager of the estate of each protected person, pursuant to s 41(1)(b) of the Act, for further consideration. 3. Orders for appointment of the NSW Trustee as receiver and manager of each protected estate pending consideration of questions arising from GDR v EKR [2012] NSWSC 1543. Catchwords: GUARDIANSHIP - protected person - Financial management - appointment of manager - Private manager - terms of appointment - Remuneration- regulatory regime - interlocutory orders pending consideration of terms of appointment - appointment of NSW Trustee as interim receiver and manager.
MENTAL HEALTH - protected person - appointment of manager of estate - Private manager - remuneration - regulatory regime - interlocutory orders pending consideration of terms of appointment - appointment of NSW Trustee as interim receiver and manager
PRACTICE - NSW Trustee and Guardian Act - protected person - appointment of manager of estate - private manager - terms of appointment - remuneration - regulatory regime - interlocutory orders pending consideration of terms of appointment - appointment of NSW Trustee as interim receiver and manager Legislation Cited: NSW Trustee and Guardian Act 2009 NSW Protected Estates Act 1983 NSW Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 NSW r 57.7(2) Trustee Companies Act 1964 NSW Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) 601RAA and 601RAB(1)(b) Supreme Court Act 1970 NSW Civil Procedure Act 2005 NSW Cases Cited: PB v BB [2013] NSWSC 1223 at [2]-[10], [27]-[29] and [38]-[60] David by his Tutor the Protective Commissioner v David (1993) 30 NSWLR 417 at 436F-437B GDR v EKR [2012] NSWSC 1543 GNM v ER [1983] 1 NSWLR 144 at 148C-149D JJK v APK (1986) Australian Torts Reports 80-042 at 67,881-67,882 Gell v Gell (2005) 63 NSWLR 547 at 553[21]), careful Ex-parte Fletcher (1801) 6 Ves Jun 427; 31 ER 1127 Re Walker, a Lunatic (1848) 2 Phil 630; 41 ER 1097 Re Westbrooke (1848) 2 Phil 631; 41 ER 1087; G v B (Powell J, 27 May 1992) BC 9201855 at 13 Anson v Anson [2004] NSWSC 766; 12 BPR 22,303 at [76] Ex-parte Warren (1805) 10 Ves Jun 622 32 ER 985 at 986 Holt v Protective Commissioner (1993) 31 NSWLR 227 at 242B-243F CC v RAM [2012] NSWSC 1555 Texts Cited: HS Theobald, The Law Relating to Lunacy (Stevens & Sons, London, 1924), pp 54, 401-403 and 511-513 LI Rotman, Fiduciary Law Thomson, Canada, 2005 at pp 56-66, 303-305, 318, 339-340, 343, 736-738 and 747-748 Category: Principal judgment Parties: JMK v RDC; and PTO v WDO Representation: Counsel: For the plaintiff in JMK v RDC: Michael Levenson (of Matthews Folbigg)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate