NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Regina v JP [2013] NSWSC 1370 Hearing dates: 16 September 2013 Decision date: 19 September 2013 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Criminal Before: Hall J Decision: Order that the accused JP be tried separately from the accused JH Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - application for separate trial - a central issue in Crown case is the identity of the person who wielded a bottle used as a weapon against the deceased - Crown case against applicant is reasonably strong circumstantial case - evidence against co-accused inadmissible against applicant - inadmissible evidence is only evidence capable of being seen as directly bearing upon above issue - Crown case made stronger by reason of prejudicial inadmissible material - jury directions not sufficient to avoid miscarriage of justice - real risk of positive injustice in joint trial - separate trial ordered Legislation Cited: Criminal Procedure Act 1986 Cases Cited: Ignjatic v R (1993) 68 A Crim R 333 Madubuko v R [2011] NSWCCA 135 Pham [2004] NSWCCA 190 R v Baartman (NSWCCA, 6 October 1994, unreported) R v Domican (1989) 43 A Crim R 24 R v Fernando [1999] NSWCCA 66 R v Iskander [2011] NSWSC 1192 R v Lockett [2013] NSWSC 859 R v Middis (NSWSC, 27 March 1991, unreported) R v Patsalis (1999) 107 A Crim R 432 R v Taouk (NSWCCA, 17 December 1992, unreported) Webb & Hay v R (1994) 181 CLR 41 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Regina (Crown) JP (Applicant) Representation: Counsel: P Leask (Crown) PD Young SC (Applicant) Solicitors: Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Crown) Lex Fori Lawyers (Applicant) File Number(s): 2011/235975
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate