NSW Caselaw
Administrative Decisions Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Azzure-Blacktown Pty Ltd, Azzure-Chiltern Pty Ltd and Azzure-Kotara Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2013] NSWADT 207 Hearing dates: 4 June 2013 Decision date: 19 September 2013 Jurisdiction: Revenue Division Before: J Block, Judicial member Decision: The assessments (and objection decisions) under review are affirmed Catchwords: "Presently entitled" and "entitled" in the context of the relevant legislation - interpretation Legislation Cited: Land Tax Management Act 1956 Cases Cited: CPT Custodians Pty Ltd v Commissioner of State Revenue for the State of Victoria (2005) 224 CLR 98; (and cases therein cited) GTN Developments Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2007] NSWADT 168 Sahab Holdings Pty Limited ATF Kanjian Family Trust v Commissioner of State Revenue for the State of Victoria (2005) 224 CLR 98 JAM Investments Australia Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2011] NSWADT 76 Texts Cited: Jacobs; Law of Trusts 7th edition at [1606-1611] Category: Principal judgment Parties: Azzure-Blacktown Pty Ltd, Azzure-Chiltern Pty Ltd and Azzure-Kotara Pty Ltd (Applicants) Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (Respondent) Representation: Counsel A de Wijn (Applicants) B Katekar (Respondent) Herbert Geer (Applicants) Crown Solicitor's Office (Respondent) File Number(s): 126070, 126071 and 126072
REasons for decision
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate