NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: David Peter Buckley v David Francis Timbury & Anor (No 2) [2013] NSWSC 1389 Hearing dates: 1 August 2013 Decision date: 20 September 2013 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Slattery J Decision: First defendant restrained from placing rocks in or near the subsoil drains under the easement. Order stayed pending parties' compliance with previous consent orders. Plaintiff to pay 25% of the defendants' costs incurred in relation to prayers (1)-(3) of the Summons. Catchwords: REAL PROPERTY - easement - actionable interference to easement by blocking sub-surface drains with rocks made out - parties unable to agree on final orders - whether injunction restraining placement of rocks an appropriate form of relief - whether a declaration should be made - whether any injunction should be conditional on the payment agreed in the previous consent orders. COSTS - plaintiff unsuccessful in relation to a dominant issue but successful on a lesser issue - relief granted against the first defendant only - no interference on the part of the second defendant - whether the plaintiff should pay some or all of the defendants' costs - whether the first and second defendant's costs should be treated differently - whether any presumption that first and second defendant each liable for half of the costs should be applied - whether a more flexible apportionment is possible, in the circumstances. Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, r 36.1, r 42.1 Cases Cited: AG NSW v Radio 2UE Sydney Pty Ltd and Anor [1993] NSWCA 134 David Peter Buckley v David Francis Timbury & Anor [2013] NSWSC 1009 Elite Protective Personnel Pty Ltd and Anor v Salmon (No 2) [2007] NSWCA 373 Korner v H Korner & Co Ltd [1951] Ch 10 Mantec Thoroughbreds Pty Ltd v Batur (2009) 25 VR 507 Maylord Equity Management Pty Ltd v Reeltime Media Ltd (No 2) [2008] NSWSC 1133 Zenere v Leate (1980) 1 BPR 9300 Category: Consequential orders Parties: Plaintiff:- David Peter Buckley First Defendant:- David Francis Timbury Second Defendant:- Susan Elsie Timbury Representation: Counsel: Plaintiff:- Ms L. Doust First and Second Defendants:- Mr J. Hewitt Solicitors: Plaintiff:- James Edward Behringer, Harris & Co Solicitors First and Second Defendants:- John Joseph Woodward, Turnbull Hill Lawyers File Number(s): 2012/142622 Publication restriction: No
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate