NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Webster & Ors v Super Smart Strategies Pty Ltd & Anor [2013] NSWSC 1399 Hearing dates: 5 September 2013 Decision date: 23 September 2013 Before: Barr AJ Decision: 1.Leave granted to the defendants; 2.Costs of Motion are to be costs in the proceedings. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - civil -application for leave to use documents produced to court in other proceedings - whether special circumstances existed Cases Cited: Blanch v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2004] NSWCA 461 Esso Australia Resources Ltd v Plowman [1995] HCA 19;(1995) 183 CLR 10 Global Medical Solutions Australia Pty Ltd v Axiom Molecular Pty Ltd [2013] NSWSC 665 Hearne v Street [2008] HCA 36; (2008) 235 CLR 125 Liberty Funding Pty Ltd v Phoenix Capital Ltd [2005] FCAFC 3; (2005) 218 ALR 283 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Richard Webster (First Plaintiff) Loris Webster (Second Plaintiff) Richard Webster and Loris Webster as trustees for the Webster Superannuation Fund (Third Plaintiff) Super Smart Strategies Pty Ltd (First Defendant) Rick Manietta (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: C Carrol (Plaintiffs) A Fernon (Defendants/ Applicants) D Harris by leave for Suncorp- Metway Pty Ltd Solicitors: Clarke Kann (Plaintiffs) Yates Beaggi (Defendants) Linklaters (Suncorp-Metway Pty Ltd) File Number(s): 2013/78666 Publication restriction: None
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate