NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: O'Shane v Harbour Radio Pty Ltd [2013] NSWCA 315 Hearing dates: 18 September, 29 November 2012 Decision date: 24 September 2013 Before: Beazley P at [1]; McColl JA at [131]; Basten JA at [159]; Tobias AJA at [243]; McCallum J at [263] Decision: Answers to referred questions (at [127]-[128]):
Question A: (i) No longer arises, but in any event, no. (ii) No. (iii) No longer arises.
Question B: Does not arise.
Question C: No.
Question D: (i) No, but in any event does not arise given the answer to Question A. (ii) Does not arise. (iii) Does not arise.
Question E: (i) No. (ii) No. Catchwords: TORTS - defamation - judicial officer suing in respect of criticism of her performance of her judicial function - defence of truth - Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, r 1.21 - questions referred to Court of Appeal - whether the defence of truth is precluded by the principle of judicial immunity - consequences for the proceedings
TORTS - defamation - judicial officer suing in respect of criticism of her performance of her judicial function - defence of truth - Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, r 1.21 - questions referred to Court of Appeal - whether the defendants defence of truth constitutes an abuse of process as inconsistent with the principle of finality
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate