NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Arnott v Glissan [2013] NSWCA 316 Hearing dates: 21 August 2013 Decision date: 26 September 2013 Before: Meagher JA at [1]; Barrett JA at [2]; Emmett JA at [3] Decision: The application is dismissed with costs. [Note: The Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 provide (Rule 36.11) that unless the Court otherwise orders, a judgment or order is taken to be entered when it is recorded in the Court's computerised court record system. Setting aside and variation of judgments or orders is dealt with by Rules 36.15, 36.16, 36.17 and 36.18. Parties should in particular note the time limit of fourteen days in Rule 36.16.] Catchwords: LEGAL PROFESSION - construction of costs agreement - no question of principle Legislation Cited: Legal Profession Act 2004, ss 302A, 322, 350, 357, 361, 368, 372, 373, 374, 375, 378, 380, 382, 384 Supreme Court Act 1970, s 69 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Maralyn June Arnott - applicant Paul Glissan - first respondent Reginald John Forster - second respondent District Court of New South Wales - third respondent Representation: Counsel: The applicant appeared in person. The first respondent appeared in person. The second and third respondents did not appear. Solicitors: File Number(s): 2013/62788 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2012-07-20 00:00:00 Before: Truss DCJ File Number(s): 2012/130486
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate