NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: St George Bank - A Division of Westpac Banking Corporation v Zhang [2013] NSWSC 1418 Hearing dates: 3 September 2013 Decision date: 03 September 2013 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Hall J Decision: Notice of Motion filed 25 May 2012 seeking relief under s 66G of the Conveyancing Act dismissed Catchwords: REAL PROPERTY - first defendant obtained three loans from plaintiff secured by mortgage over block of land - subsequently three defendants amalgamated their disparate blocks of land into one certificate of title - Register describes interest of each proprietor by reference to the previous folio as interim measure which creates folios of multiple ownership - three defendants chose not to progress with amalgamation - first defendant's loans fell into arrears - application by plaintiff for relief under s 66G of the Conveyancing Act 1919 to appoint trustees for sale - whether land the subject of the certificate of title can be in 'co-ownership' as defined by s 66F(1) of the Act - whether defendants entitled to an interest in the land of the other - certificate of title records ownership in terms of "of the part formerly in" - not a case in which defendants hold title as either joint tenants or tenants in common - relief not available under s 66G Legislation Cited: Conveyancing Act 1919 Real Property Act 1900 Cases Cited: Aoun Investments Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of Revenue [2006] NSWSC 1394 Commonwealth Bank of Australia v MacDonald [2000] NSWSC 553 Texts Cited: Baalman & Wells' Land Titles office Practice Woodman & Nettle's, The Torrens System in NSW Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: St George Bank (Plaintiff) Wei Zhang (First Defendant) Guang Qing (Lydia) Zhang (Second Defendant) Qining Feng (Third Defendant) Representation: Counsel: L Gor (Plaintiff) No Appearance (First Defendant) Unrepresented (Second Defendant) No Appearance (Third Defendant) Solicitors: Kemp Strang (Plaintiff) No Appearance (First Defendant) In person (Second Defendant) No Appearance (Third Defendant) File Number(s): 2010/108317
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate