NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Roads & Traffic Authority of New South Wales v Barrie Toepfer Earthmoving & Land Management Pty Ltd (No 4) [2013] NSWSC 1420 Hearing dates: 18, 19 September 2013 Decision date: 24 September 2013 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Price J Decision: Report admitted into evidence. Catchwords: Evidence - admissibility - whether opinions expressed were admissible - whether discretion to exclude should be exercised. Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 s 76(1), s 79, s 135 Cases Cited: Dasreef Pty Ltd v Hawchar [2011] HCA 21; (2011) 243 CLR 588 HG v The Queen [1999] HCA 2; (1999) 197 CLR 414 Makita (Australia) Pty Ltd v Sprowles [2001] NSWCA 305; (2001) 52 NSWLR 705 Nicholls & Ors v Michael Wilson & Partners Ltd [2012] NSWCA 383 Texts Cited: Stephen Odgers, Uniform Evidence Law, 10th ed (2012) Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Roads and Traffic Authority of New South Wales (plaintiff) Mr Toepfer (defendant; cross-claimant) CGU Insurance Limited (1st cross-defendant) Vero Insurance Limited (2nd cross-defendant) NTI Limited (3rd cross-defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr Glissan QC + Mr Manion (plaintiff) Mr Deakin QC + Mr Stockley (cross-defendants) Solicitors: Mr J Saxton & Mr J Davis Robert Saxton Primrose Dunn solicitors (plaintiff) Mr B Hedges & Ms L Antoun Walker Hedges & Co solicitors (cross-defendants) File Number(s): 2009/293003
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate