NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Rose v Premier of Queensland Department, (Hon. Campbell Newman, Premier) (No 2) [2013] NSWSC 1421 Hearing dates: 23 September 2013 Decision date: 23 September 2013 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: R A Hulme J Decision: 1. The proceedings in respect of each defendant are dismissed. 2. The plaintiffs are to pay the costs of those defendants who have filed an appearance. Catchwords: PROCEDURE - unrepresented plaintiffs - notice of motion to strike out statement of claim - incomprehensible pleadings do not disclose cause of action - no issue of principle Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Rose v Premier of Queensland Department, (Hon. Campbell Newman, Premier) and ors [2013] NSWSC 1363 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Janice Rose (First Plaintiff) Kathleen Guthrie (Second Plaintiff) Premier of Queensland Department, (Hon. Campbell Newman, Premier (First Defendant) and 39 others Representation: Counsel: In person (Plaintiffs) N Gouliaditis (2nd & 36th Defendants) R Iaconis (19th Defendant) R Pillay (20th Defendant) E Gair (30th Defendant) E Austin-Woods (32nd Defendant) A Langshaw (33rd Defendant) I Bennett (24th & 34th Defendants) Solicitors: Australian Government Solicitor (2nd & 36th Defendants) Dibbs Barker (19th & 30th Defendants) Australian Business Lawyers (32nd Defendant) Maddocks (33rd Defendant) Sparke Helmore (24th & 34th Defendants) File Number(s): 2013/231445
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate