NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Hamilton v State of New South Wales [2013] NSWSC 1437 Hearing dates: 19 September 2013 Decision date: 30 September 2013 Before: Bellew J Decision: 1.The matter is listed for further directions at 9.30 am on Friday 4 October 2013, at which time the parties are to bring in Short Minutes of Order reflecting the conclusion I have reached. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - application by defendant for an order that the plaintiff submit to MRI examination - where plaintiff alleged post concussional syndrome and cognitive impairment - where onset of cognitive impairment was late - where previous MRI scan evidenced cerebral shrinkage - where order sought so as to allow the defendant to investigate the presence of cerebral pathology unrelated to the accident
EVIDENCE - evidence in support of application for an order that the plaintiff submit to MRI examination - evidence sufficient to establish that the proposed testing may throw light on the issues
EVIDENCE - admissibility of hearsay evidence on interlocutory applications - whether exception extends to hearsay evidence of expert opinion Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules (NSW) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Cases Cited: Boral Transport Pty Limited Gulic [2013] NSWCA 150 GB v Western Sydney Area Health Service [2010] NSWSC 181 KF by her Tutor RF v Royal Alexandra Hospital for Children known as the Children's Hospital Westmead and anor [2010] NSWSC 891 Portal Software International Pty Limited v Bodsworth [2005] NSWSC 1115 Rowlands v State of NSW [2009] NSWCA 136; (2009) 74 NSWLR 715 Terranora Group Management Pty Limited v Terranora Lakes Country Club Limited (in liq) (SC (NSW) 1 December 1997 Santow J unreported) Texts Cited: Uniform Evidence Law (9th Edition) - Odgers Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Thomas David Hamilton - Plaintiff State of New South Wales - Defendant Representation: Mr D Morgan - Plaintiff Mr S Woods - Defendant Garling Lawyers - Plaintiff Makinson & d'Apice Lawyers - Defendant File Number(s): 2012/185616 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate