NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: The Trust Company (PTAL) Pty Ltd v Romeo (No 5) [2013] NSWSC 1449 Hearing dates: 30 September 2013 Decision date: 01 October 2013 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Schmidt J Decision: Adjournment sought not granted. Catchwords: PROCEDURE - application for an adjournment - refused - reasons for refusal Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 Contracts review Act 1980 Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Cases Cited: Australian New Zealand Banking Group Ltd v Mio Amico Pty Ltd [2013] NSWSC 716 Perpetual Trustee Australia Limited v Romeo (No. 2) [2011] NSWSC 1190 Romeo v The Trust Company (PTAL) Ltd [2012] NSWCA 62 The Trust Company (PTAL) Pty Ltd v Romeo (No 3) [2013] NSWSC 347 The Trust Company (PTAL) Pty Ltd v Romeo (No 4) [2013] NSWSC 1447 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: The Trust Company (PTAL) Pty Ltd (Formerly known as Permanent Trustee Australia Limited) (First Plaintiff) Balmain Fund Administration Ltd (Second Plaintiff) Giuseppe Romeo (First Defendant) Anna Maria Romeo (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr RI Bellamy (Plaintiffs) Solicitors: Norton Rose Fulbright Australia (Plaintiffs) Mr Mattiussi, Russells (First Defendant) File Number(s): 2010/83709 Publication restriction: None
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate