NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Bin Radimin v R; Bin Zakhria v R [2013] NSWCCA 220 Hearing dates: 7 June 2013 Decision date: 03 October 2013 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] Hidden J at [106] Fullerton J at [107] Decision: In relation to Grounds 1 and 2, grant leave to appeal but dismiss the appeal. In relation to Ground 3 raised by the applicant, Agus Bin Radimin, leave to appeal refused. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - conviction appeal - people smuggling - s233C Migration Act - appellants were crew on boat bound for Australia/Ashmore Reef from Indonesia with twenty three passengers - trial judge directed that the necessary intention was facilitating the bringing of people to Australia - whether necessary to establish that the immediate destination was part of Australia or only that the ultimate destination was Australia - mention of a particular destination does not create an additional element of offence - evidence established knowledge that ultimate destination was Australia - no misdirection - whether trial miscarried because summing up by a trial judge was unbalanced and unfair - extent to which trial judge required to set out each particular challenge to the evidence of each passenger - summary of evidence comprehensive - summing up not favouring either side - no objection to summing up made at trial - ground of appeal not made out - APPEAL AGAINST SENTENCE - whether sentence manifestly excessive - mandatory minimum head sentence and minimum non-parole period - no error identified - leave to appeal refused. Legislation Cited: Migration Act 1958 - s233C Cases Cited: Alomalu v R [2012] NSWCCA 255 Bahar v R [2011] 255 FLR 80 Domican v R [1992] HCA 13; 173 CLR 555 Healey v Regina [2006] NSWCCA 235 Huynh v The Queen [2013] HCA 6; 295 ALR 624 Karim & Ors v R [2013] NSWCCA 23 R v Karabi [2012] QCA 47 R v Latif; Ex parte CEPPP, [2012] QCA 278 R v Nitu [2012] QCA 224 R v Selu; Ex parte CDPP [2012] QCA 345 Sunada v R; Jaru v R [2012] NSWCCA 187 Taru Ali v R [2013] NSWCCA 211 The Queen v Ahmad [2012] NTCCA 1; 256 FLR 423 Vuni v R [2006] NSWCCA 171 Williams v R (1990) 50 A Crim R 213 Zamudin v R [2013] NSWCCA 120 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Agus Bin Radimin - Applicant Sahdan Effendi Bin Zakhria - Applicant Regina - Respondent Crown Representation: Counsel: Mr P Boulten SC - Applicant Radimin Mr S Corish - Applicant Zakhria Ms W Abrahams QC - Respondent Crown Solicitors: File Number(s): 2011/106459 2011/106460 Decision under appeal Before: Charteris DCJ File Number(s): 2011/106459 2011/106460
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate