NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Aktas v Westpac Banking Corporation Ltd [2013] NSWSC 1451 Hearing dates: 30 September 2013 Decision date: 30 September 2013 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Beech-Jones J Decision: (1) Leave to appeal under s 385 of the Legal Profession Act 2004 is refused. (2) The plaintiff's summons is dismissed. (3) The plaintiff is to pay the defendant's costs of the proceedings. Catchwords: COSTS - assessment - Review Panel - application for leave to appeal - when leave should be granted - accountant and solicitor fees - filing fee - whether determination of Panel arbitrary - whether reasons were inadequate. Legislation Cited: - Legal Profession Act 2004 Cases Cited: - Aktas v Westpac Banking Corporation Ltd [2007] NSWSC 1261 - Aktas v Westpac Banking Corporation Ltd [2009] NSWCA 9 - Aktas v Westpac Banking Corporation Ltd [2010] HCA 25; 241 CLR 79 - Aktas v Westpac Banking Corporation Ltd (No 2) [2010] HCA 47; 241 CLR 570 - Aktas v Westpac Banking Corporation Ltd [2013] NSWSC 1198 - Andrews v John Fairfax & Sons Ltd [1980] 2 NSWLR 225 - Chapmans Ltd v Yandell [1999] NSWCA 361 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Paul Uysal Aktas (Plaintiff) Westpac Banking Corporation Ltd (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: J.F. Heazlewood (Plaintiff) Ms K. Dawson (Defendant) Solicitors: Penhall & Co (Plaintiff) King & Wood Mallesons (Defendant) File Number(s): 2013/006067, 2013/202401
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate