NSW Caselaw
Administrative Decisions Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Vlahos v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2013] NSWADT 215 Hearing dates: 6 September 2013 Decision date: 02 October 2013 Jurisdiction: Revenue Division Before: A Verick, Judicial Member Decision: The application to review the decision made by the Chief Commissioner of State Revenue on 1 June 2012 is dismissed. Catchwords: STATE REVENUE - Duties Act 1997- transfer "in partial conformity with" the contract - meaning of "related person" -review on grounds of estoppel and "fairness". Legislation Cited: Duties Act 1997 Taxation Administration Act 1996 Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 Interpretation Act 1987 Cases Cited: Lake Victoria Ltd v Commissioner of State Revenue (1949) 49 SR (NSW) 262 Vickery v Woods (1951) 85 CLR 336 Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Wade (1951) 84 CLR 105 Commissioners of Inland Revenue v Brooks (1915) AC 478 Maritime Electric Co. Ltd v General Dairies Ltd (1937) AC 610 BBLT Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of the Office for State Revenue [2003] NSWSC 1003 R v Inland Revenue Commissioners; Ex parte Preston (1985) AC 835 R v Inland Revenue Commissioners; Ex parte National Federation of Self-Employed and Small Businesses Ltd [1982] AC 617 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Paul John Vlahos (Applicant) Elizabeth May Vlahos (Applicant) Vicki Rochelle Vlahos (Applicant) Joshua Paul Vlahos (Applicant) Stella Maria Kondilis (Applicant) Issac Chami (Applicant) Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (Respondent) Representation: Counsel M Sealey (Respondent) P Vlahos (Applicant - Agent) Crown Solicitor (Respondent) File Number(s): 136017
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate