NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: In the matter of Vivo International Corporation Pty Limited [2013] NSWSC 1462 Hearing dates: 23 September 2013 Decision date: 02 October 2013 Jurisdiction: Equity Division - Corporations List Before: Black J Decision: Orders made for statutory demand to be set aside. Catchwords: CORPORATIONS - statutory demands - application to set aside a statutory demand under ss 459H or 459J Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) - where alleged debt arises from a claim under an agreement in respect of a statutory recycling scheme and the dispute about the right to payment flows from a dispute as to whether recycling services were provided - whether evidence in support of one ground to set aside a statutory demand can be used as evidence in support of another ground - whether genuine dispute raised about the provision of recycling services - whether further argument raised that alleged debt was incorrectly calculated - whether affidavit sufficiently raised this argument under the Graywinter principle - whether offsetting claim exists - whether some other reason to set aside statutory demand. Legislation Cited: - Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 459G, 459H, 459H(1), 459H(1)(a), 459H(1)(b), 459H(2), 459H(5), 459J, 459J(1)(b) - Product Stewardship Act 2011 (Cth) ss 4(1), 4(2), 18, 23, 24 - Product Stewardship (Television and Computer) Regulations 2011 (Cth) Pt 5 Cases Cited: - Arris Investments Pty Ltd v Fahd [2010] NSWSC 309 - Blatch v Archer (1774) 1 Cowp 63; (1774) 98 ER 969 - Commercial Union Assurance Co of Australia Ltd v Ferrcom Pty Ltd (1991) 22 NSWLR 389 - Eyota Pty Ltd v Hanave Pty Ltd (1994) 12 ACSR 785 - Graywinter Properties v Gas and Fuel Corp Superannuation Fund (1996) 70 FCR 452; (1996) 21 ACSR 581 - Hopetoun Kembla Investments Pty Ltd v JPR Legal Pty Ltd [2011] NSWSC 1343; (2011) 87 ACSR 1 - Infratel Networks Pty Ltd v Gundry's Telco and Rigging Pty Ltd [2012] NSWCA 365; (2012) 92 ACSR 27 - Jesseron Holdings Pty Ltd v Middle East Trading Consultants Pty Ltd (No 2) (1994) 13 ACSR 787 - Mibor Investments Pty Ltd v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [1994] 2 VR 290; (1993) 11 ACSR 362 - NA Investment Holdings Pty Ltd v Perpetual Nominees Ltd [2010] NSWCA 210; (2010) 79 ACSR 544 - National Telecoms Group Ltd v Bulldogs Rugby League Club [2003] NSWSC 654 - NT Resorts Pty Ltd v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (1998) 153 ALR 359 - Re 2 Roslyn Street Pty Ltd - 2 Roslyn Street Pty Ltd v Leisure Inn Hospitality Management Pty Ltd [2011] NSWSC 512 - Re UGL Process Solutions Pty Ltd [2012] NSWSC 1256 - Reinsurance Australia Corp v Odyssey Re (Bermuda) Ltd [2000] NSWSC 1118; (2000) 36 ASCR 348 - Roadships Logistics Ltd v Tree [2007] NSWSC 1084; (2007) 64 ACSR 671 - Scanhill Pty Ltd v Century 21 Australasia Pty Ltd (1993) 47 FCR 451; (1993) 12 ACSR 341 - SMEC International Pty Ltd v CEMS Engineering Inc [2001] NSWSC 459; (2001) 38 ACSR 595 - Spencer Constructions Pty Ltd v G & M Aldridge Pty Ltd [1997] FCA 681; (1997) 76 FCR 452; (1997) 24 ACSR 353 - WEC Pty Ltd v Cypriot Community of Queensland Inc [2002] QCA 506 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Vivo International Corporation Pty Limited (Plaintiff) E-Cycle Solutions Pty Limited (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: A. Shearer (Plaintiff) N. Mirzai (Defendant) Solicitors: Kemp Strang (Plaintiff) Settle Legal (Defendant) File Number(s): 2013/201311
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate