NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Kanatlarovski v Vasilkov [2013] NSWDC 185 Hearing dates: 11 and 13 December 2012 Decision date: 16 July 2013 Before: Olsson SC DCJ Decision: Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $30,838.75. Catchwords: BREACH OF CONTRACT - s 32AA Home Building Act 1989 - whether contract made in contravention is void and unenforceable Legislation Cited: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) Fair Trading Act 1987 Home Building Act 1989 Home Building (Amendment) Act 2004 Pharmacy Act 1964 Trade Practices Act 1974 Cases Cited: Archbolds (Freightage) Ltd v S. Spanglett Ltd (1961) 1 QB 374 Bellgrove v Eldridge (1954) 90 CLR 613 Chappuis v Filo [1990] 19 NSWLR 490 Redwood Anti-Ageing Pty Ltd v Knowles [2013] NSWSC 10 May 2013 Ruxley Electronics and Construction Ltd v Forsyth [1995] 3 All ER 268 St John Shipping Corporation v Joseph Rank Ltd [1957] 1 QB 267 Ventura v Svira [1961] WAR 63 Yango Pastoral Company Pty Ltd v First Chicago (1978) 139 CLR 410 Texts Cited: Statutory Interpretation: The Meaning of Meaning", the Honourable Michael Kirby AC CMG, [2011] MelbULawRw 3 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Peter Kanatlarovski (Plaintiff) Dzrave Vasilkov (Defendant) Representation: R Jefferis (Plaintiff) S Robertson (Defendant) Church & Grace (Plaintiff) Redmond Hale Simpson (Defendant) File Number(s): 2011/317161
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate