NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Ishak Cicek and anor. v The Estate of the late Mark Solomon and ors. (No 2) [2013] NSWSC 1479 Hearing dates: 8 October 2013 Decision date: 08 October 2013 Before: Bellew J Decision: Leave to rely on further affidavits refused. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - where evidentiary statements served by plaintiffs - where order made by Registrar that plaintiffs not be permitted to rely upon further affidavit material without leave of the court - where Registrar's order made six months prior to trial - where plaintiffs served further affidavit material approximately one week prior to trial - where affidavit material raised new issues - where defendant had made forensic decisions as to the conduct of the case based upon evidentiary statements - where granting of leave would necessitate lengthy adjournment of proceedings so as to allow defendants to investigate new issues raised - where such adjournment would cause further delay and additional costs - leave to rely upon further affidavit material refused Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act (NSW) 2005 Cases Cited: AON Risk Services Australia Limited v The Australian National University (2009) 239 CLR 175
Ishak Cicek and anor. v The Estate of the late Mark Solomon and anor. [No 1] [2013] NSWSC 1490 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Ishak Cicek - First plaintiff Ulka Basak Tilli - Second plaintiff The Estate of the late Mark Solomon - First defendant National Australia Bank - Third defendant Representation: In person - Plaintiffs HWL Ebsworth - First defendant Turks Legal - Third defendant File Number(s): 2011 / 327029
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate