NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Isbester v R [2013] NSWCCA 230 Hearing dates: Friday 27 September 2013 Decision date: 14 October 2013 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] Latham J at [60] Bellew J at [61] Decision: Leave to appeal is granted. The appeal is dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - conviction appeal - recklessly dealing with money which was the proceeds of crime - s400.4(2) Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) - grounds of appeal that verdict unreasonable and incorrect directions as to elements of offence - offender delivering large amounts of cash to participants in a fraudulent tax avoidance scheme - whether cash delivered could ever be "proceeds of crime" as defined in the Act - what was the correct legal characterisation of the cash delivered by the offender - elements of offence made out and directions adequate - appeal dismissed. Legislation Cited: Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) - s400.4(2)\ Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Taxation Administration Act 1953 Cases Cited: DPP v Jeffery [1992] 58 A Crim R 310 Saffron v DPP [1989] 96 FLR 196 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Arthur James Isbester - Appellant Cth Regina - Respondent Crown Representation: Counsel: Mr P Neil SC/Mr S Flood - Appellant Mr S Odgers SC/Mr M Leighton-Daly - Respondent Crown Solicitors: Blair Criminal Lawyers - Appellant Commonwealth DPP - Respondent Crown File Number(s): 2010/66002 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2013-07-24 00:00:00 Before: Tupman DCJ File Number(s): 2010/66002
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate