NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Inghams Enterprises Pty Limited v Valentina Lakovska [2013] NSWSC 1489 Hearing dates: 1 February 2013 Decision date: 11 October 2013 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Hidden J Decision: Summons dismissed Catchwords: WORKERS COMPENSATION - medical examination - appeal to Appeal Panel from medical assessment certificate - whether Appeal Panel failed to confine itself to the ground of appeal found by the registrar - whether the Panel approached the appeal as a hearing de novo rather than a rehearing. Legislation Cited: - Workplace Injury Management Workers & Compensation Act 1998 - Workers Compensation Legislation Amendment Act 2010 Cases Cited: Siddik v WorkCover Authority of NSW [2008] NSWCA 116 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Inghams Enterprises Pty Limited (plaintiff) Valintina Lakovska (1st defendant) An Appeal Panel of the Workers Compensation Commission constituted pursuant to s 328(1) of the Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998 (2nd defendant) The Registrar of the Workers Compensation Commission (3rd defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr C Jackson (plaintiff) Ms M Allars with Mr L Morgan Solicitors: Paul H Macken - Leigh Virtue & Associates (plaintiff) Martin H F Bell - Martin Bell & Co, Solicitors (1st defendant) I V Knight, Crown Solicitor (2nd defendant) I V Knight, Crown Solicitor (3rd defendant) File Number(s): 2012/153477
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate