NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Feltham v Workers Compensation Nominal Insurer [2013] NSWDC 189 Hearing dates: 15, 16, 21, 22 & 26 August 2013 Decision date: 27 August 2013 Before: Neilson DCJ Decision: I grant leave to the plaintiff to commence proceedings in this Court pursuant to section 151(2) of the Workers Compensation Act 1987 on 9 May 2012 I order that the plaintiff pay the defendant's costs of the notice of motion Catchwords: CIVIL - Personal injury - Workers compensation - Limitation period - Plaintiff commenced proceedings against defendant for workplace related injuries - Defendant relies upon s 151D in defence to whole of claim - Plaintiff brings notice of motion seeking leave to continue proceedings - Question whether three year limitation period had expired - Whether limitation period runs from accrual of cause of action or date of injury of plaintiff - Question of when plaintiff became aware she was required to seek leave to commence proceedings against former employer at common law - Question of whether injuries suffered were "a result of the nature and conditions of the plaintiff's employment" - Whether type of work which plaintiff did for earlier consecutive employer caused or materially contributed to plaintiff's injury - Whether defendant prejudiced by fact that ability to pursue cross-claim against earlier employer is negated because records either lost or destroyed - Evidence of witnesses as to system of work at defendant's premises - Whether defendant prejudiced by effluxion of time and evidentiary deficiencies - Question of delay since defendant's insurer declined workers compensation claim and plaintiff's commencing a common law action - Issue of conduct of plaintiff's solicitor Legislation Cited: Workers Compensation Act 1987 s 151D Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998 s 318 Cases Cited: Afarin v Excelior Pty Limited [2013] NSWDC 65 Benton v QBE Workers Compensation (NSW) Ltd [2013] NSWDC 107 Braserio v Zodhope Pty Ltd (Sorby DCJ, unreported, 28 March 2013) Brisbane South Regional Health Authority v Taylor (1996) 186 CLR 541 Creevey v Barrois [2005] NSWCA 264 Fletcher International Exports Pty Ltd v Barrow [2007] NSWCA 244 GIO General Limited v Love [2009] NSWCA 269 Itek Graphix Pty Ltd v Elliott [2002] NSWCA 104; (2002) 54 NSWLR 207 Mirkovic v Davids Holdings Pty Ltd (1995) 11 NSWCCR 656 Opoku v P & M Quality Smallgoods Pty Limited & Ors [2012] NSWSC 478 Parry v Masterpet Australia Pty Ltd [2013] NSWDC 71 Perry v Tanine Pty Ltd (1998) 16 NSWCCR 253 The Salvation Army (South Australian Property Trust) v Rundle [2008] NSWCA 347 Simpson or Thom v Sinclair [1917] AC127 at 192; (1917) 10 BWCC 220 at 235 Strasburger Enterprises Pty Ltd trading as Quix Food Stores v Serna [2008] NSWCA 354 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Heather Feltham (Plaintiff) Workers Compensation Nominal Insurer (Defendant) Representation: Mr J Wilson (Plaintiff) Ms M Dulhunty (Defendant) Stacks/The Law Firm (Plaintiff) DLA Piper (Defendant) File Number(s): 2012/147664
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate