NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Pincevic v Nicholas Panos t/as N Panos & Associates [2013] NSWDC 188 Hearing dates: 19, 20, 26 and 29 August 2013 Decision date: 29 August 2013 Before: Gibson DCJ Decision: (1) Summons dismissed. (2) Plaintiff pay defendant's costs, including the costs of the defendant's notice of motion, on an indemnity basis. (3) Defendant's notice of motion dismissed. Catchwords: COSTS ASSESSMENT - appeal from Costs Assessor's determination regarding payment of a barrister briefed by the plaintiff's solicitors for conduct of proceedings concerning land tax objections - counsel's fee agreement contained an estimate for one set of proceedings - plaintiff commences further proceedings and receives oral advice about continuing legal costs - whether costs assessor erred in his determination that there had been adequate compliance with the provisions requiring estimates for future costs - plaintiff now a litigant in person - application for plaintiff's business partner to be appointed as a "McKenzie friend" (McKenzie v McKenzie [1971] P 33; [1970] 3 All ER 1034; [1970] 3 WLR 472) - identification of grounds of appeal from poorly drafted summons - whether grounds of appeal were brought pursuant to s 384 or s 385 - application for leave to adduce fresh evidence - applications for adjournments - summons dismissed - application for indemnity costs - whether appropriate where the party against whom the order is sought is not legally represented - indemnity costs ordered Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), ss 56 and 60 Legal Profession Act 2004 (NSW), ss 308, 316, 384 and 385 Cases Cited: Bellevarde Constructions Pty Ltd v CPC Energy Pty Ltd (2011) 12 DCLR (NSW) 304; [2011] NSWDC 55 D'Orta-Ekenaike v Victoria Legal Aid (2005) 223 CLR 1 Damjanovic v Maley (2002) 55 NSWLR 149 Dubow v Fitness First Australia Pty Ltd [2011] NSWCA 401 Gorczynski v AWM Dickinson & Son [2005] NSWSC 277 JP Morgan Trust Australia Ltd v Hammond [2012] NSWSC 213 Macedon Shire Ranges Council v Thompson [2009] VSCA 209 McKenzie v McKenzie [1971] P 33; [1970] 3 All ER 1034; [1970] 3 WLR 472 Texts Cited: - Category: Principal judgment Parties: Plaintiff: Anton Pincevic Defendant: Nicholas Panos t/as N Panos & Associates Representation: Plaintiff: Mr T Brikich (as McKenzie friend) Defendant: Mr J Cesta-Incani Plaintiff: In person Defendant: Bahlmann Burke Lawyers File Number(s): 2013/42052 Publication restriction: None
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate