NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Perrin v SAS Trustee Corporation [2013] NSWDC 191 Hearing dates: 9 and 10 September 2013 Decision date: 20 September 2013 Before: Gibson DCJ Decision: (1) Set aside the decision of the defendant made on 6 September 2007 insofar as the plaintiff's pension entitlements are concerned. (2) I determine the plaintiff's pension be increased to 85% (s 10(1A)(b) of the Police Regulation (Superannuation) Act 1906 (NSW)), to be paid on and from 6 September 2007. (3) The defendant pay the plaintiff's costs. (4) Exhibits retained for 28 days. Catchwords: Police Superannuation and Pensions - retirement on account of incapacity - claim for additional entitlement - incapacity for work outside the police force Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 56 District Court Act 1973 (NSW), s 142J Police Regulation (Superannuation) Act 1906 (NSW), ss 3, 5, 8, 9A, 10, 10B, 14, 21 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 31.10 Cases Cited: Checchia v Insurance Australia Ltd t/as NRMA Insurance (2013) 64 MVR 36 Dasreef Pty Ltd v Hawchar (2011) 243 CLR 588 Joseph Street Pty Ltd v Khay Tek Tan [2010] VSC 586 Lembcke v SAS Trustee Corporation (2003) 56 NSWLR 736 Makita (Aust) Pty Ltd v Sprowles (2001) 52 NSWLR 705 Poole v State Authorities Superannuation Board (2000) 20 NSWCCR 633 Texts Cited: - Category: Principal judgment Parties: Plaintiff: Scott David Perrin Defendant: SAS Trustee Corporation Representation: Plaintiff: Mr P O'Rourke Defendant: Mr T Ower Plaintiff: Walter Madden Jenkins Defendant: Rodney Steventon Blume File Number(s): RJ00078/12 Publication restriction: None
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate