NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Melham v Katter [2013] NSWDC 203 Hearing dates: 27 September 2013 Decision date: 18 October 2013 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Gibson DCJ Decision: (1) The defendants' notice of motion seeking to set aside judgment for $1 million entered on 23 July 2013 is dismissed. (2) The defendants' oral application to amend the notice of motion and, in lieu of order (2), seek a declaration is dismissed. (3) Defendants pay plaintiff's costs. (4) Liberty to apply in relation to costs. (5) Exhibits retained for 28 days. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - set aside judgment entered following settlement on the first day of the hearing - application to set aside based on asserted non-compliance by plaintiff with provisions in the Terms of Settlement - construction of the provisions in the Terms of Settlement - whether entry of judgment against good faith (UCPR Pt 36 r 36.15) - application dismissed Legislation Cited: District Court Act 1973 (NSW), s 134(1)(b) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 36.15 and 36.16 Cases Cited: AT v Commissioner of Police (No 2) [2010] NSWCA 337 Byrne v Australian Airlines Ltd (1995) 185 CLR 410 Cash v Wells (1830) 109 ER 826 DJL v Central Authority (2000) 201 CLR 226 Franklins Pty Ltd v Metcash Trading Ltd [2009] NSWCA 40 Fulham Partners LLC v National Australian Bank [2013] NSWCA 296 GR Securities v Baulkham Hills Private Hospital (1986) 40 NSWLR 631 Hall v Busst (1960) 104 CLR 206 Harvey v Phillips (1956) 95 CLR 235 Kendell v Carnegie [2006] NSWCA 302 Mackay v Dick (1881) 6 AC 251 Meehan v Jones (1982) 149 CLR 571 Roach v B & W Steel Pty Ltd (1991) 23 NSWLR 110 Suttor v Gundowda Pty Ltd (1950) 81 CLR 413 Tonitto v Bassal (1992) 28 NSWLR 564 University of Western Australia v Gray (2009) FCR 346 Yorkshire Water Services Ltd v Sun Alliance & London Insurance PLC [1997] 2 Lloyd's Rep 21 Texts Cited: Ritchie Uniform Civil Procedure Rules (LexisNexis) Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Plaintiff/Respondent: Robert George Melhem Defendants/Applicants: Joseph Katter and Susan Vera Katter Representation: Plaintiff/Respondent: Mr J A Hogan-Doran / Ms T Phillips Defendants/Applicants: Ms V Culkoff Plaintiff/Respondent: Consolidated Lawyers Defendants/Applicants: Comino Prassas Solicitors File Number(s): 2011/144484 Publication restriction: None
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate