NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: GROUNDSTROEM, Christoffer Andreas v R [2013] NSWCCA 237 Hearing dates: 14 August 2013 Decision date: 31 October 2013 Before: Macfarlan JA at [1] Adams J at [2] Button J at [67] Decision: 1. Leave to appeal granted. 2. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal against conviction - sexual assault - historical sexual assault - husband rapes wife - issue of consent - delay in complaint - whether significant forensic disadvantage - lack of medical records of the complainant in documenting the complaint - admissions of husband to counsellor and the police - effect of delay rather than length important - directions - counsel must apply with details of forensic disadvantage alleged Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 Criminal Appeal Rules Cases Cited: R v WSP [2005] NSWCCA 427 Evans v The Queen [2007] HCA 59; (2007) 235 CLR 521; (2007) 82 ALJR 250 Texts Cited: Stephen Odgers, Uniform Evidence Law, 9th ed (2010) Thomson Reuters Category: Principal judgment Parties: Christoffer Andreas Groundstroem (Appellant) Regina (Crown) Representation: Solicitors: Nyman Gibson Stewart (Appellant) Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown) File Number(s): 2010/112633 Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9101 Date of Decision: 2011-09-26 00:00:00 Before: DCJ O'Connor File Number(s): 2010/112633
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate