NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Pierre MOSS [2013] NSWDC 207 Decision date: 09 May 2013 Before: Cogswell SC DCJ Decision: Convicted of the offence of using a carriage service to menace, harass or cause offence. Sentenced to 12 months imprisonment. Release directed forthwith upon entering a recognisance in the sum of $500 to be of good behaviour for 12 months. Offence held to be a Class 2 registrable offence under the Child Protection (Offenders Registration) Act 2000. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - Particular offence - using a carriage service to menace, harass or cause offence - coach of under 14 girls' soccer team exchanged inappropriate and offensive text messages with 12 year old team member. Sentence - relevant factors - gravity of offence - significant breach of trust and authority - no prior criminality given less weight as that factor allowed offender into position of trust he abused - response to charge - remorse - contrition - guilty plea - 20 per cent discount - good prospects of rehabilitation - nature and circumstances of offender - violent marriage - psychiatric and psychological material - bipolar disorder, anxiety, depression - connection between condition and offending behaviour - purpose of sentence - general deterrence significant factor due to difficulty in detecting offence - significance reduced due to offender's mental condition - appropriate for sentence to be suspended. Sentencing Orders - whether or not offence involved an "act of indecency" in respect of a child - a Class 2 registrable offence under the Child Protection (Offenders Registration) Act 2000 - limited extra curial punishment. Sentencing Procedure - relevant material - victim impact statement. Legislation Cited: Child Protection (Offenders Registration) Act 2000, s 3A(1). Child Protection (Offenders Registration) Regulation, reg 18. Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), s 17A. Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth), s 473.4, s 474.17, s 474.27A. Cases Cited: Eades v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (2010) 77 NSWLR 173; [2010] NSWCA 241. Purves v Inglis (1915) 34 NZLR 1051. R v Manson, R v Stamenkovic (Court of Criminal Appeal, 17 February 1993, unreported). TMTW v R [2008] NSWCCA 50. Category: Sentence Parties: Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown) Pierre Moss (Offender) Representation: Counsel: G E Wright (Crown) G Porter (Offender) File Number(s): DC 2012/83530 Publication restriction: His Honour has elected to use pseudonyms for the names of the offender and the child to protect the child's identity.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate