NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Orchard v R [2013] NSWCCA 239 Hearing dates: 11 October 2013 Decision date: 25 October 2013 Before: Gleeson JA at [1] RA Hulme J at [2] Adamson J at [3] Decision: Extension of time to file application for leave to appeal refused. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - whether extension of time should be granted - hopeless appeal - no arguable grounds - application to change plea- no error in refusal - whether sentence manifestly excessive or otherwise affected by error - no error in reasoning or result - extension of time refused Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900, s 38 s 61I, s 61J(2)(d), 61L Cases Cited: R v Fordham (1997) 98 A Crim R 359 R v Stephens (New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal, 11 November 1994, unreported) Veen v The Queen (No. 2) [1988] HCA 14; 164 CLR 465 Texts Cited: --- Category: Principal judgment Parties: Ronald James Orchard (Applicant) Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Self Represented (Applicant) S Dowling SC (Respondent) Solicitors: Self Represented (Applicant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): 2006/12017 Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal Citation: --- Date of Decision: 2008-10-10 00:00:00 Before: Finnane QC DCJ File Number(s): 2006/12017
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate