NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Cruse v Lifetime Care and Support Authority [2013] NSWSC 1546 Hearing dates: 6 August 2013 Decision date: 25 October 2013 Before: Harrison J Decision: 1. The second further amended summons dismissed with costs. 2. Make no order with respect to the cross-summons. Catchwords: APPEAL - orders seeking to set aside determination of the Lifetime Care and Support Authority - order seeking to restrain Authority from considering further applications - whether 2007 or 2012 Guidelines apply to application for participation in the Scheme - STATUTORY INTERPRETATION - meaning of s 9 and s 16 Motor Accidents (Lifetime Care and Support) Act - summons dismissed Legislation Cited: Lifetime Care and Support Guidelines Limitation Act 1969 Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 Motor Accidents (Lifetime Care and Support) Act 2006 Cases Cited: Alcan (NT) Alumina Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Territory Revenue [2009] HCA 41; (2009) 239 CLR 27 Allianz Australia Ltd v Crazzi [2006] NSWSC 1090; (2006) 68 NSWLR 266 Berowra Holdings Pty Ltd v Gordon [2006] HCA 32; (2006) 225 CLR 364 Coleman v Gray (1994) 55 FCR 412 Collector of Customs v Agfa-Gevaert Ltd [1996] HCA 36; (1996) 186 CLR 389 CIC Insurance Ltd v Bankstown Football Club Ltd [1997] HCA 2; (1997) 187 CLR 384 Craig v South Australia [1995] HCA 58; (1995) 184 CLR 163 Cruse v Review Panel Established under the Motor Vehicle (Lifetime Care & Support) Act 2006 [2012] NSWSC 507 Gifford v Strang Patrick Stevedoring Pty Ltd [2003] HCA 33; (2003) 214 CLR 269 K & S Lake City Freighters Pty Ltd v Gordon & Gotch Ltd [1985] HCA 48; (1985) 157 CLR 309 Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf [2001] HCA 30; (2001) 206 CLR 323 NRMA Insurance Ltd v Motor Accidents Authority [2004] NSWSC 567; (2004) 61 NSWLR 264 Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority [1998] HCA 28; (1998) 194 CLR 355 Thiering v Daly [2011] NSWSC 1345 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Stephen Matthew Cruse (Plaintiff) Lifetime Care and Support Authority (First Defendant) Insurance Australia trading as NRMA Insurance Limited (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: G P Craddock SC and S A Beckett (Plaintiff) K Rewell SC (Second Defendant) Solicitors: Beilby Poulden Costello (Plaintiff) Moray & Agnew (Second Defendant) File Number(s): 2013/112064 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate