NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Mainteck Services Pty Limited v Stein Heurtey SA and Stein Heurtey Australia Pty Ltd [2013] NSWSC 1563 Decision date: 25 October 2013 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Sackar J Decision: See paragraph [13] Catchwords: PROCEDURE - slip rule - application of slip rule to correct error resulting from misapprehension of counsel's position. Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Cases Cited: Elite Protective Personnel Pty Ltd and Anor v Salmon (No 2) [2007] NSWCA 373 Georgouras v Bombardier Investments No. 2 Pty Ltd [2013] NSWSC 1549 Hatton v Harris [1892] AC 547 Mainteck Services Pty Limited v Stein Heurtey SA and Stein Heurtey Australia Pty Ltd [2013] NSWSC 266 Mainteck Services Pty Limited v Stein Heurtey SA and Stein Heurtey Australia Pty Ltd [2013] NSWSC 1165 Mutual Shipping Corporation of New York v Bayshore Shipping Co of Monrovia [1985] 1 All ER 520 Sabah Yazgi v Permanent Custodians Limited (No 2) [2007] NSWCA 306 Yore Contractors Pty Ltd v Holcon Pty Ltd (NSWSC, Rogers CJ, Comm Div, 17 July 1989, unreported, BC8901954 Category: Costs Parties: Mainteck Services Pty Limited (Plaintiff) Stein Heurtey SA (First Defendant) Stein Heurtey Pty Ltd (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: F Corsaro SC and F Kalyk (Plaintiff) P Taylor SC and J T G Gibson (Defendants) Solicitors: Piper Alderman (Plaintiff) Jones Day (Defendants) File Number(s): 2007/266650
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate