NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Visscher v Maritime Union of Australia (No 3) [2013] NSWSC 1565 Hearing dates: 25 October 2013 Decision date: 25 October 2013 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Beech-Jones J Decision: 1. The application to amend the Defence is refused. 2. The tender of the Industrial Relations Commissioner's judgment dated 20.05.03 and the internet publication "workplace express" dated 21.05.13 is rejected. Catchwords: AMENDMENT - application to amend defence to plead plaintiff's bad reputation - material relied on not in same "sector" as reputation said to be imperilled by imputations - application refused. Legislation Cited: - Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Cases Cited: - Aon Risk Services Australia Ltd v Australian National University [2009] HCA 27; 239 CLR 175 - Australian Broadcasting Corporation v McBride [2001] NSWCA 322; 53 NSWLR 430 - Chappell v Mirror Newspapers Ltd (1984) Aust Tort Reports 80-691 - O'Hagan v Nationwide News Pty Ltd [2001 NSWCA 302; 53 NSWLR 89 - Visscher v BHP [2003] AIRC 536 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Timothy Visscher (Plaintiff) Maritime Union of Australia (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: T. Molomby SC, Ms L. Goodchild (Plaintiff) R.K. Weaver (Defendant) Solicitors: Roderick Storie Solicitors (Plaintiff) Slater & Gordon (Defendant) File Number(s): 2011/339947
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate