NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Le Mottee Group Pty Limited v Port Stephens Council [2013] NSWLEC 1210 Hearing dates: 29 October 2013 Decision date: 04 November 2013 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Hussey C Decision: Appeal dismissed Catchwords: Subdivision: Character/lot size, wastewater arrangements, stormwater control, precedent. Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979 Port Stephens Local Environmental Plan 2000 Port Stephens Development Control Plan 2007 Cases Cited: Goldin & Anor v Minister for Transport Administering the Ports Corporatision and Waterways Management Act 1995 [2002] NSWLEC Category: Principal judgment Parties: Le Mottee Group Pty Limited (Applicant)
Port Stephens Council (Respondent) Representation: Mr T Pickup (Solicitor) (Respondent)
Mr P Le Mottee (Applicant in person) (Applicant) Solicitors Local Government Legal (Respondent) File Number(s): 10404 of 2013 Publication restriction: Nil
Judgment
Background 1This appeal was lodged against council's refusal of a development application for a 2 - lot residential subdivision at 7 Morpeth Views, Wallalong. The proposed lots are described as: * Lot 72 - with an area of 1,522 sq m and containing an existing dwelling house * Lot 71 - with an area of 1820 sq m. 2The contentions identified for the appeal are summarised as follows: * The development does not satisfy the zone objectives relative to consistency with the existing subdivision pattern and character of the locality. * Insufficient details of the proposed wastewater arrangements as required by Clause 47 of the LEP. * Insufficient details of the proposed stormwater management arrangements have been provided.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate