NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Rix v Wells (No. 2) [2013] NSWSC 1608 Hearing dates: 16 September, 30 October 2013 Decision date: 30 October 2013 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Darke J Decision: 1. That the further amended statement of claim filed on 3 October 2013 be struck out pursuant to UCPR r 14.28. 2. That the further amended statement of claim filed on 14 October 2013 be struck out, either pursuant to UCPR r 14.28 or otherwise pursuant to UCPR r 4.15. 3. That the plaintiff pay the second and third defendants' costs of the notice of motion filed on 31 July 2013. Catchwords: PROCEDURE - summary disposal - whether sufficiently high degree of certainty regarding ultimate outcome - claims inadequately pleaded - distinction between existence of a reasonable cause of action and the pleading of a reasonable cause of action - where plaintiff self-represented - where plaintiff failed to comply with orders of the court to file and serve evidence in support of claim - application dismissed
PROCEDURE - pleadings - application to strike out statement of claim - statement of claim has tendency to cause prejudice, embarrassment or delay in the proceedings - statement of claim struck out - no leave to re-plead in present circumstances Legislation Cited: Conveyancing Act 1919 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Cases Cited: Agar v Hyde [2000] HCA 41; (2000) 201 CLR 552 General Steel Industries Incorporated v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) [1964] HCA 69; (1964) 112 CLR 125 ICM Agriculture Pty Ltd v Young [2009] FCA 109 Rix v Mahony [2009] NSWSC 675 Rix v Wells [2013] NSWSC 672 O'Brien v Bank of Western Australia Limited [2013] NSWCA 71 Spencer v The Commonwealth [2010] HCA 28; (2010) 241 CLR 118 White Industries Australia Limited v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (2007) 160 FCR 298 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Frederick George Rix (Plaintiff) Malcolm George Brown (Second defendant) Romano Di Donato (Third defendant) Representation: Counsel: AP Coleman SC with RA Yezerski (Second and Third Defendants) Solicitors: Yeldham Price O'Brien Lusk File Number(s): SC: 2013/19198 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate