NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: RATCLIFF, Lillian v R [2013] NSWCCA 259 Hearing dates: 25 - 26 March 2013 Decision date: 12 November 2013 Before: Bathurst CJ at [1]; Beazley P at [5]; Hoeben CJ at CL at [6]; Blanch J at [7]; Price J at [8] Decision: Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal pursuant to certificate under s 5F(3)(b) of the Criminal Appeal Act 1912 - motion that indictment be quashed based on inconsistency between State and Commonwealth laws dismissed. CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - whether there is inconsistency between State and Commonwealth laws - whether s 25 of the Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW) is inconsistent with Pt 9.1 of the Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth). Legislation Cited: Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth), Pt 9.1 Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985, s 25 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Lillian Ratcliff (Appellant) Crown (Respondent) Attorney General of NSW (Intervening) Representation: Counsel: A Healey (Appellant) M Cinque (Respondent) M G Sexton SC and G Wright on behalf of the Attorney General Solicitors: Aboriginal Legal Service (NSW/ACT) Ltd (Appellant) Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): 2009/268587 Publication restriction: No Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9101 Date of Decision: 2010-11-09 00:00:00 Before: Freeman DCJ File Number(s): 2009/268587
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate