NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Zahorsky v R [2013] NSWCCA 268 Hearing dates: 14 October 2013 Decision date: 12 November 2013 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1]; Johnson J at [2]; Bellew J at [66] Decision: Application for extension of time to appeal against sentence refused Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - sentence appeal - asserted Muldrock error - application for extension of time in which to appeal -Applicant convicted after trial in February 2010 - offences of causing a person to take an intoxicating substance with intent to have sexual intercourse without consent (s.38(b) Crimes Act 1900), indecent assault (s.61L) and having sexual intercourse without consent (s.61I) - s.61I offence only subject to standard non-parole period - sole ground of appeal asserted Muldrock error - no appeal in relation to sentences for other offences - Muldrock error demonstrated -whether some lesser sentence warranted in law - where challenge is made to only one of several sentences imposed at the same time - held no lesser sentence warranted in law - insufficient prospects of success - application for extension of time to appeal refused Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Crimes Act 1900 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 Cases Cited: Abdul v R [2013] NSWCCA 247 Ali v R [2010] NSWCCA 35 Baxter v R [2007] NSWCCA 237; 173 A Crim R 284 Christie v R [2012] NSWCCA 228 Douar v R [2005] NSWCCA 455; 159 A Crim R 154 Essex v R [2013] NSWCCA 11 Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; 244 CLR 120 Pearce v The Queen [1998] HCA 57; 194 CLR 610 R v TA [2003] NSWCCA 191; 57 NSWLR 444 R v Thalari [2009] NSWCCA 170; 75 NSWLR 307 Shortland v R [2013] NSWCCA 4 Williams v R [2012] NSWCCA 172 Texts Cited: --- Category: Principal judgment Parties: Lubo Zahorsky (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr CJ Bruce SC (Applicant) Ms TL Smith (Respondent) Solicitors: Legal Aid NSW (Applicant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): 2009/4674 Publication restriction: --- Decision under appeal Citation: --- Before: Knox SC DCJ File Number(s): 2009/4674
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate