NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: AB v R [2013] NSWCCA 273 Hearing dates: 18 October 2013 Decision date: 14 November 2013 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1]; Johnson J at [2]; Bellew J at [113] Decision: Application for extension of time to appeal against sentence refused Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - sentence appeal - application for extension of time to appeal - Applicant sentenced in November 2009 -Applicant pleaded guilty to offences of knowingly taking part in the manufacture of a prohibited drug (s.24(1) Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985), possession of a precursor (s.24A(1)) and manufacturing a large commercial quantity of a prohibited drug (s.24(2)) - s.24(2) offence committed whilst Applicant on bail for s.24(1) and s.24A(1) offences - only s.24(2) offence subject to standard non-parole period - claim of Muldrock error in relation to s.24(2) offence - no challenge made to sentences for s.24(1) and s.24(2) offences - held no Muldrock error demonstrated - claim of disparity between the sentences of the Applicant and his co-offender for the s.24(2) offence - held no legitimate sense of grievance in relation to the sentence imposed on co-offender - no lesser sentence warranted in any event - insufficient prospects of success - application for extension of time to appeal refused Legislation Cited: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 Firearms Act 1996 Listening Devices Act 1984 Weapons Prohibition Act 1996 Cases Cited: Abdul v R [2013] NSWCCA 247 Alameddine v R [2006] NSWCCA 317 Hili v The Queen [2010] HCA 42; 242 CLR 520 Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; 244 CLR 120 Ng v R [2011] NSWCCA 227; 214 A Crim R 191 R v AB [2011] NSWCCA 229 R v Achurch [2011] NSWCCA 186; 216 A Crim R 152 R v AZ [2011] NSWCCA 43; 205 A Crim R 222 R v Calcutt [2012] NSWCCA 40; 221 A Crim R 505 R v Thalari [2009] NSWCCA 170; 75 NSWLR 307 Vandeventer v R [2013] NSWCCA 33 Texts Cited: --- Category: Principal judgment Parties: AB (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr E Ozen (Applicant) Ms MM Cinque (Respondent) Solicitors: Legal Aid NSW (Applicant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): 2009/4435 Publication restriction: --- Decision under appeal Citation: --- Date of Decision: 2009-11-11 00:00:00 Before: Ellis DCJ File Number(s): 2008/5378
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate