NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Efthimiadis v R [2013] NSWCCA 276 Hearing dates: 23 October 2013 Decision date: 14 November 2013 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1]; Johnson J at [2]; Latham J at [84] Decision: Application for extension of time to appeal against sentence refused Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - sentence appeal - application for extension of time to appeal - Applicant sentenced in February 2010 - Applicant convicted after trial of solicit to murder (s.26 Crimes Act 1900) - offence subject to standard non-parole period - Applicant (42 years old) solicits another person to murder Applicant's partner (19 years old) - motive to obtain custody of two-year old child of relationship - offence committed in breach of conditional liberty - significant criminal history - importance of specific and general deterrence - sole ground of appeal asserted Muldrock error - Muldrock error conceded by Crown - whether some lesser sentence is warranted in law - held no lesser sentence is warranted - insufficient prospects of success - application for extension of time to appeal refused Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Cases Cited: Abdul v R [2013] NSWCCA 247 Baxter v R [2007] NSWCCA 237; 173 A Crim R 284 Bou-Antoun v R [2008] NSWCCA 1 Douar v R [2005] NSWCCA 455; 159 A Crim R 154 Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; 244 CLR 120 R v Burton [2008] NSWCCA 128 R v Louizos [2009] NSWCCA 71; 194 A Crim R 223 R v Nguyen [2013] NSWCCA 195 R v Palu [2002] NSWCCA 381; 134 A Crim R 174 R v Potier [2004] NSWCCA 136 R v Qutami [2001] NSWCCA 353; 127 A Crim R 369 Texts Cited: --- Category: Principal judgment Parties: Theodore Efthimiadis (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Ms JS Manuell SC (Applicant) Ms MM Cinque (Respondent) Solicitors: Legal Aid NSW (Applicant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): 2007/9839 Publication restriction: --- Decision under appeal Citation: --- Date of Decision: 2010-02-17 00:00:00 Before: His Honour Judge CE O'Connor QC File Number(s): 2007/9839
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate