NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Re Sarah [2013] NSWCA 379 Hearing dates: 5 November 2013 Decision date: 05 November 2013 Before: Meagher JA at [1] Barrett JA at [28] Ward JA at [35] Decision: 1. Extend time for application for leave to appeal to 5 November 2013; 2. Dismiss application for leave to appeal; 3. Dismiss first respondent's notice of motion of 27 August 2013; 4. Order applicant to pay respondents' costs of these proceedings. [Note: The Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 provide (Rule 36.11) that unless the Court otherwise orders, a judgment or order is taken to be entered when it is recorded in the Court's computerised court record system. Setting aside and variation of judgments or orders is dealt with by Rules 36.15, 36.16, 36.17 and 36.18. Parties should in particular note the time limit of fourteen days in Rule 36.16.] Catchwords: FAMILY LAW AND CHILD WELFARE - child welfare under state legislation - adoption - where it is not apparent on the child's instrument of consent that the child's counsellor has certified that the child understands the effect of signing that instrument - where no notification of putative birth father or consent dispense order thereto - whether in the best interests of the child to grant leave to appeal Legislation Cited: Adoption Act 2000 Children and Young Persons (Care and Protection) Act 1998 Status of Children Act 1996 Supreme Court Act 1970 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Cases Cited: Clyne v NSW Bar Association [1960] HCA 40; (1960) 104 CLR 186 D v Director-General Department of Community Services [2005] NSWCA 474 Director General Department of Family and Community Services; Re Stephen [2011] NSWSC 1521 Director-General, Family and Community Services Re Felicity [2012] NSWCA 272 Druett v Director-General of Community Services [2001] NSWCA 126 GKD v Director-General, Attorney General's Department [2012] NSWCA 219 Krishna v Lovett [2011] NSWCA 354 Moulieux Pty Limited & Girvan NSW Pty Ltd (Receiver and Manager Appointed) (Court of Appeal, 20 September 1991, unreported) Re DG and The Adoption Act 2000 (NSW) [2007] FMCAfam 712; (2007) 38 Fam LR 122 Williams v Spautz [1992] HCA 34; (1992) 174 CLR 509 Category: Principal judgment Parties: JL (Applicant) KLP and JSP (First Respondent) Director-General, Department of Family and Community Services (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Applicant self represented G Moore (First Respondent) Ms S Christie (Second Respondent) R D Wilson SC (Amicus curiae) Solicitors: Ellis McLachlan Solicitors (First Respondent) I V Knight, Crown Solicitor (Second Respondent) File Number(s): CA 2013/212651 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2012-03-02 00:00:00 Before: Black J File Number(s): A167/2011
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate