NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: In the matter of Courtesy Real Estate (NSW) Pty Limited [2013] NSWSC 1666 Hearing dates: 31 October 2013 Decision date: 14 November 2013 Jurisdiction: Equity Division - Corporations List Before: Black J Decision: Certain orders to be made by consent of the parties; application for interlocutory order requiring reappointment of director dismissed; order for costs in the cause. Catchwords: CORPORATIONS - oppression - seriously arguable case that removal of director was in breach of shareholders agreement - whether balance of convenience favours interlocutory order for reappointment of director - where applicant had not been a director for several months before interlocutory relief seeking his reappointment was sought - availability of other orders to protect applicant's interests. Legislation Cited: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 198F, 232-233, 247A, 250A, 1322 Cases Cited: - Australian Broadcasting Corporation v O'Neill [2006] HCA 46; (2006) 227 CLR 57 - Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Rich [2003] NSWSC 297 - Business World Computers Pty Ltd v Australian Telecommunications Commission (1988) 82 ALR 499 - Catley v Waipa Corporation Ltd (2004) 2 NZCCLR 50 - Kolback Securities Ltd v Epoch Mining NL (1987) 8 NSWLR 533 - Goyal v Chandra [2006] NSWSC 239; (2006) 68 NSWLR 313 - Patrick Stevedores Operations No 2 Pty Ltd v Maritime Union of Australia (No 3) [1998] HCA 30; (1998) 195 CLR 1; (1998) 27 ACSR 535 - Tumminello v TAB Ltd [2011] NSWSC 1639 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Robert Michael Gillespie (First Plaintiff/First Applicant) RM Gillespie Investments Pty Ltd (Second Plaintiff/Second Applicant) Courtesy Real Estate (NSW) Pty Ltd (First Defendant/First Respondent) Abbycam Pty Limited (Second Defendant/Second Respondent) Henawade Pty Limited (Third Defendant/Third Respondent) S&D Slater Investments Pty Ltd (Fourth Defendant/Fourth Respondent) D&D Grant Investments Pty Ltd (Fifth Defendant/Fifth Respondent) Peter Douglas Matthews (Sixth Defendant/Sixth Respondent) Kingsley Raymond Yates (Seventh Defendant/Seventh Respondent) Shane Michael Slater (Eighth Defendant/Eighth Respondent) Daniel Grant (Ninth Defendant/Ninth Respondent) Representation: Counsel: H.K. Insall SC (Plaintiffs/Applicants) C. Harris SC (Defendants/Respondents) Solicitors: Hughes & Associates (Plaintiffs/Applicants) Atkinson Vinden (Defendants/Respondents) File Number(s): 2013/192515
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate