NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Gittany (No 3) [2013] NSWSC 1670 Hearing dates: 8 November 2013 Decision date: 13 November 2013 Before: McCallum J Decision: Call by Crown for production of documents over which client legal privilege claimed by accused rejected Catchwords: CRIME - evidence - where accused served notice of intention to call evidence that deceased had a tendency to act in a particular way - call by Crown for production of any statements taken by solicitor for accused from persons identified in notice - whether client legal privilege lost upon service of notice - whether client legal privilege lost upon calling witnesses to give evidence in the case for the accused Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995, ss 97, 119, 122, 167 Evidence Regulation 2010, cl 5 Cases Cited: Grey v R [2001] HCA 65 Lee v New South Wales Crime Commission [2013] HCA 39 Mallard v R [2005] HCA 68; (2005) 224 CLR 125 Petroulias (No 22) [2007] NSWSC 692; (2007) 176 A Crim R 309 R v Haydon (No 5) [2005] SASC 19 South Australian Government Financing Authority v Bank of New Zealand [2002] SASC 56 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Regina Simon Gittany (accused) Representation: Counsel: M Tedeschi AM QC (Crown) P Strickland SC (accused) Solicitors: Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown) Bannisters Lawyers & Attorneys (accused) File Number(s): 2011/250258 Publication restriction: None
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate