NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Landa v Perpetual Trustees Victoria [2013] NSWSC 1685 Hearing dates: 19 and 20 August 2013 Decision date: 01 November 2013 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Young AJ Decision: 1. Plaintiff's case fails and defendant is entitled to orders on the cross-claim; 2. Mortgagee entitled to take possession of Plaintiff's home. Catchwords: AGENCY - where mortgage broker misappropriated loan monies - whether mortgage broker acting with actual or apparent authority of mortgagee - actual or apparent authority - principles to be applied
CONTRACTS - unjust - where mortgage broker misappropriated loan monies - whether Contracts Review Act 1980 (NSW) excluded - whether contract entered into in the course of "trade, business or profession" - meaning of "business" - question of fact - principles to be applied Legislation Cited: Contracts Review Act 1980 (NSW) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Cases Cited: A v B1 (No 2) [2012] WASC 383; 271 FLR 122 GE Mortgage Solutions Limited v Fassos [2012] NSWSC 1446 Heperu Pty Ltd v Morgan Brooks Pty Ltd [2007] NSWSC 1438 Heperu Pty Ltd v Belle [2009] NSWCA 252; 76 NSWLR 230 Heperu Pty Ltd v Belle (No 3) [2013] NSWSC 1088 Inland Revenue Commissioners v Desoutter Bros Ltd (1945) 62 TLR 110 Perpetual Trustees Australia Ltd v Schmidt [2010] VSC 67 Peterson v Moloney [1951] HCA 57; 84 CLR 91 Re Wallis; ex parte Sully (1885) 14 QBD 950 Re Pszon [1946] 2 DLR 507 Tonto Home Loans Australia v Tavares [2011] NSWCA 389; 15 BPR 29,699, Town Investments Ltd v Department of the Environment [1978] AC 359 VACC Insurance Ltd v BP Australia Ltd [1999] NSWCA 427; 47 NSWLR 716 Violet Home Loans Pty Ltd v Schmidt [2013] VSCA 56; 93 ACSR 205 West v AGC (Advances) Ltd (1986) 5 NSWLR 610 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Barry Samuel Landa (First plaintiff) Gtrad Pty Ltd (Second defendant) Perpetual Trustees Victoria Ltd ACN 004 027 258 (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: GK Burton SC / T Bray (Plaintiff) M Ashurst SC / MP Cleary (Defendant) Solicitors: Thomas Henry Bray Lawyer (Plaintiff) Kemp Strang (Defendant) File Number(s): 2009/289582
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate