NSW Caselaw
Administrative Decisions Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: AVM v Victims Compensation Fund Corporation. [2013] NSWADT 257 Hearing dates: On the papers Decision date: 14 November 2013 Jurisdiction: Victims Support Division Before: P H Molony, Judicial Member Decision: 1. The appeal is dismissed. 2. Cost of the appeal is allowed in the exercise of my discretion in the sum of $500 inclusive of GST. Catchwords: Victims Rights and Support - psychological disorder - meaning of severe disability - proof of scarring Legislation Cited: Victim Support and Rehabilitation Act 1996 Victims Rights and Support Act 2013 Victims Rights and Support Regulation 2012 Cases Cited: Buckley v Victims Compensation Fund Corporation (2004) NSW SC 513 Texts Cited: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders DSM IV TR. Category: Principal judgment Parties: AVM (Applicant) Victims Compensation Fund Corporation (Respondent) Representation: Lough & Wells Lawyers (Applicant) File Number(s): 137103 Publication restriction: S 126 Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997
reasons for decision
Background 1AVM claims statutory compensation for injuries which he received as a primary victim of an assault that occurred on 2 October 2010. He claimed to have suffered; * A chronic psychological disorder that was disabling. * A deviated nasal septum requiring septoplastomy. * Scarring to his face, resulting in minor disfigurement. 2The Compensation Assessor was not satisfied that AVM was suffering from a Category 2 psychological or psychiatric disorder that is severely disabling. The assessor was satisfied that AVM had sustained a deviated nasal septum as a result of the assault, which merits $2,400 compensation under the schedule of injuries. Photographs of the injury did not establish that facial disfigurement was a compensable injury. Because AVM's total entitlement for compensation for his injuries was below the threshold for compensation, AVM's claim for compensation for compensable injuries was dismissed.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate