NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Koh v R [2013] NSWCCA 287 Hearing dates: 25 October 2013 Decision date: 22 November 2013 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1]; Johnson J at [2]; Latham J at [145] Decision: Application for extension of time to appeal against sentence refused Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal - sentence - application for extension of time to appeal - Applicant sentenced in June 2011 - alleged Muldrock error - knowingly taking part in supply of large commercial quantity of prohibited drug - 2,272.612 kilograms of 100% pure MDP2P - more than 4,000 times large commercial quantity - capable of providing 2,454 kilograms of pure MDMA - total street value about $500 million - Applicant travels to Australia to perform range of activities related to offence - Muldrock error not demonstrated - no error in assessment of objective seriousness - sentence not manifestly excessive - lesser sentence not warranted in any event - no merit in proposed grounds of appeal - extension of time to appeal refused Legislation Cited: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 Prisoners (Interstate Transfer) Act 1983 (Vic) Cases Cited: Abdul v R [2013] NSWCCA 247 Bolt v R [2012] NSWCCA 50 George v R [2013] NSWCCA 263 Magaming v The Queen [2013] HCA 40; 87 ALJR 1060 Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25; 228 CLR 357 Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; 244 CLR 120 Nguyen v R; Phommalysack v R [2011] VSCA 32; 31 VR 673 Paxton v R [2011] NSWCCA 242; 219 A Crim R 104 R v Calcutt [2012] NSWCCA 40; 221 A Crim R 505 R v Koh [2007] VCC 1484 R v Li [2008] VCC 901 R v Nguyen [2010] NSWCCA 238; 205 A Crim R 106 R v Niketic [2002] NSWCCA 425 R v Qutami [2001] NSWCCA 353; 127 A Crim R 369 The Queen v Olbrich [1999] HCA 54; 199 CLR 270 Weininger v The Queen [2003] HCA 14; 212 CLR 629 Wong v The Queen [2001] HCA 64; 207 CLR 584 Texts Cited: --- Category: Principal judgment Parties: Keng Chuan Koh (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Ms BJ Rigg (Applicant) Ms M Cinque (Respondent) Solicitors: Legal Aid NSW (Applicant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): 2010/23722 Publication restriction: --- Decision under appeal Citation: --- Date of Decision: 2011-06-10 00:00:00 Before: Her Honour Judge Woodburne SC File Number(s): 2010/23722
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate