NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: R v Little [2013] NSWCCA 288 Hearing dates: 18 November 2013 Decision date: 18 November 2013 Before: Blanch J at [1] RA Hulme J at [33] Bellew J at [34] Decision: Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - sentencing - Crown appeal against sentence - whether sentence is manifestly inadequate - whether accumulation inadequate - whether non-parole period inadequate - effect of imminent release - effect of mental health issues - Crown appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Criminal Appeal Act 1912, s 5D(1) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 112(3), s 96 Mental Health (Forensic Provisions) Act 1990 Cases Cited: R v Henry (1999) 46 NSWLR 346 Regina v Weldon; Regina v Carberry (2002) 136 A Crim R 55 Green v The Queen; Quinn v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 462 Johnson v The Queen (2004) 205 ALR 346 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Crown (Applicant) Daniel James Little (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: V Lydiard - Applicant P Hamill SC - Respondent Solicitors: S Kavanagh, Solicitor for Public Prosecutions - Applicant S E O'Connor, Legal Aid NSW - Respondent File Number(s): 2010/65426 Publication restriction: No Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9101 Citation: R v Daniel James Little Date of Decision: 2013-04-19 00:00:00 Before: Judge English File Number(s): 2010/65426
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate