NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Geitz v R [2013] NSWCCA 289 Hearing dates: 31 July 2013 Decision date: 22 November 2013 Before: Beazley P at [1]; Johnson J at [126]; Price J at [127] Decision: The appeal is dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal - conviction - break, enter and steal - whether trial judge erred in law in failing to leave to the jury an alternative offence of receiving stolen property.
CRIMINAL LAW - appeal - conviction - whether jury verdict is unreasonable or cannot be supported having regard to the evidence. Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 Cases Cited: Libke v The Queen [2007] HCA 30; 230 CLR 559 M v The Queen [1994] HCA 63; 181 CLR 487 MFA v The Queen [2002] HCA 53; 213 CLR 606 Mifsud v R [2009] NSWCCA 313 Nguyen v R (1992) 60 A Crim R 196 R v Aldrich (1993) 67 A Crim R 371 R v McCarthy and Ryan (1993) 71 A Crim R 395 R v Springfield (1969) 53 Cr App R 608 SKA v The Queen [2011] HCA 13; 243 CLR 400 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Thomas Earl Geitz (Appellant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: K Averre (Appellant) S Herbert (Respondent) Solicitors: Legal Aid NSW (Appellant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): CCA 2011/335149 Publication restriction: No Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9101 Citation: R v Thomas Earl Geitz Date of Decision: 2012-06-04 00:00:00 Before: Murrell DCJ File Number(s): 2011/335149
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate