Sydney Attractions Group Pty Ltd v Frederick Schulman (No 4) [2013] NSWSC 1728

Supreme Court New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Sydney Attractions Group Pty Ltd v Frederick Schulman (No 4) [2013] NSWSC 1728 Hearing dates: 21 November 2013 Decision date: 21 November 2013 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Sackar J Decision: See paragraph [28] Catchwords: PROCEDURE - stay of execution of judgment and orders pending appeal - general principles - where notice of intention of appeal has been filed but not notice of appeal - whether evidence establishes a risk that the judgment will not be repaid if not stayed - terms on which stay should be granted. Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Cases Cited: Alexander v Cambridge Credit Corporation Ltd (1985) 2 NSWLR 685 Andrews v John Fairfax & Sons Ltd [1979] 2 NSWLR 184 Bunnings Forest Products Pty Ltd v Bullen and Others (1994) 126 ALR 660 Chen v Marcolongo [2009] NSWCA 121 Goldstein v Craft (1926) 26 SR(NSW) 354 Holmark Constructions Pty Ltd v Tsoukaris (1986) 12 NSWLR 181 McBride v Sandland (No 2) [1918] HCA 59; (1918) 25 CLR 369 Re Middle Harbour Investments Ltd (In Liquidation) (Court of Appeal, 15 December 1976, unreported) Penrith Whitewater Stadium Ltd and Anor v Lesvos Pty Ltd and Anor [2007] NSWCA 103 Saleh v Romanous [2010] NSWCA 373 Sydney Attractions Group Pty Ltd v Frederick Schulman [2013] NSWSC 858 Sydney Attractions Group Pty Ltd v Frederick Schulman (No 2) [2013] NSWSC 1153 Sydney Attractions Group Pty Ltd v Frederick Schulman (No 3) [2013] NSWSC 1544 TCN Channel 9 Pty Ltd v Antoniadis (No 2) (1999) 48 NSWLR 381 Trad v Harbour Radio Pty Ltd [2010] NSWCA 41 Texts Cited: Ritchie's Uniform Civil Procedure NSW Category: Consequential orders Parties: Sydney Attractions Group Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) Frederick Schulman (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: R McKeand SC (Plaintiff) N Kidd SC (Defendant) Solicitors: Herbert Geer (Plaintiff) Levitt Robinson (Defendant) File Number(s): 2010/92382