NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Alpha v R [2013] NSWCCA 292 Hearing dates: 8 November 2013 Decision date: 28 November 2013 Before: Leeming JA [1] Bellew J [3] RS Hulme AJ [80] Decision: (i) The application for an extension of time in which to seek leave to appeal is dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal - practice and procedure - where substantial delay in filing notice of intention to appeal - where extension of time required - where delay not adequately explained - principles to be applied in determining an application for an extension of time
CRIMINAL LAW - appeal - where asserted disparity in sentence imposed upon the applicant when compared with sentences imposed on co-offenders - where applicant and co-offenders were part of a conspiracy to import a substantial quantity of MDMA -where applicant's role found by the sentencing judge to be greater than that of co-conspirators - where finding not challenged - principles to be applied in assessing the role of conspirators - necessity to go beyond isolated overt acts in which a conspirator may have engaged - where sentencing judge adopted a starting point in sentencing the applicant which was 9 years higher than that adopted in the case of co-offenders - no justifiable sense of grievance - no substantial injustice arising from the sentence imposed - application for extension of time dismissed Legislation Cited: Criminal Code 1995 (Cth) Firearms Act 1996 NSW Weapons Prohibition Act 1998 NSW Cases Cited: Abdul v R [2013] NSWCCA 247 Dwayhi v R; Bechara v R [2011] NSWCCA 67; (2011) 205 A Crim R 27 Gill v R [2010] NSWCCA 236 Green v R; Quinn v R [2011] HCA 49; (2011) 244 CLR 462 Lowe v R (1984) 154 CLR 606 McCraw v R [2011] NSWCCA 162 Muldrock v R [2011] HCA 39; (2011) 244 CLR 120 Pavicevic v R [2010] ACTCA 25 R v Spizzerri [2001] VSCA 49 R v Swan [2006] NSWCCA 47 Sinkovich v Attorney General of New South Wales [2013] NSWCA 383 Tatana v R [2006] NSWCCA 398 Tyler v R; R v Chalmers [2007] NSWCCA 247 Winter v R [2013] NSWCCA 231 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Alpha - Applicant Crown - Respondent Representation: Counsel: W P Lowe and S Milanovic - Applicant C O'Donnell - Respondent Solicitors: File Number(s): 2008/16246003 Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9101 Date of Decision: 2010-04-09 00:00:00 Before: Lakatos SC DCJ
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate