NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Attorney General of New South Wales v Built NSW Pty Ltd [2013] NSWCCA 299 Hearing dates: 20 June 2013 Decision date: 02 December 2013 Before: Bathurst CJ at [1]; Beazley P at [145]; Hoeben CJ at CL at [146] Decision: 1. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: INDUSTRIAL LAW - criminal procedure - prosecution under the Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000 - requirement that proceedings be instituted by persons including inspector - whether inspector in fact instituted prosecutions. INDUSTRIAL LAW - criminal procedure -Criminal Procedure Act 1986 s 246 - District Court Rules 1973 Pt 53 r 26 - whether application and statement of facts are required to be signed by the inspector. INDUSTRIAL LAW - criminal procedure - failure to correctly institute proceedings - whether Criminal Procedure Act s 16(2) operates to validate proceedings. INDUSTRIAL LAW - criminal procedure - Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000 - failure to particularise - whether charges disclose offence known to law - whether charges can be saved or amended. JURISIDICTION - appeal - Criminal Appeal Act 1912 s 5C - notice of contention - whether Court of Criminal Appeal able to deal with issues within notice of contention. Legislation Cited: Consumer Protection Act 1969, s 32 Crimes Act 1900, s 178BB Criminal Appeal Act 1912, s 5C Criminal Appeal Rules Criminal Procedure Act 1986, ss 3, 11, 12, 15, 16, 17, 20, 21, 126, 246 District Court Rules 1973, Pt 53 r 26 Industrial Relations Commission Rules 1996, r 217B Justices Act 1902, s 65 Obscene and Indecent Publications Act 1901, s 36 Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000, ss 8, 91, 93, 106 Supreme Court (Summary Jurisdiction) Act 1967, s 6 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, r 50.11 Cases Cited: Area Concrete Pumping Pty Ltd v Inspector Childs [2012] NSWCA 208; (2012) 223 IR 86 Broome v Chenoweth (1946) 73 CLR 583 Certain Lloyd's Underwriters Subscribing to Contract No IH00AAQS v Cross [2012] HCA 56; (2012) 87 ALJR 131 Corbyn v Walker Corporation Pty Ltd [2012] NSWLEC 75; (2012) 186 LGERA 442 Crothers v Sheil (1933) 49 CLR 399 Doja v The Queen [2009] NSWCCA 303; (2009) 198 A Crim R 349 Epacris Pty Ltd v Director-General, Department of Natural Resources [2007] NSWCCA 76; (2007) 69 NSWLR 507 Ex parte Thomas; Re Otzen (1947) 47 SR (NSW) 261 Garrett v Freeman [2006] NSWCCA 278; (2006) 68 NSWLR 729 GPI (General) Pty Ltd v Industrial Court of New South Wales [2011] NSWCA 157; (2011) 207 IR 93 John Holland Pty Ltd v Industrial Court of New South Wales [2010] NSWCA 338; (2010) 202 IR 82 John L Pty Ltd v Attorney General (NSW) [1987] HCA 42; (1987) 163 CLR 508 Kirk v Industrial Court of New South Wales [2010] HCA 1; (2010) 239 CLR 531 Knaggs v Director of Public Prosecutions [2007] NSWCA 83; (2007) 170 A Crim R 366 Ove Arup Pty Ltd v Industrial Court of New South Wales [2006] NSWCA 28; (2006) 149 IR 193 Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority [1998] HCA 28; (1998) 194 CLR 355 R v Bacon [1973] 1 NSWLR 87 R v Beydoun (1990) 22 NSWLR 256 R v Boujaoude [2008] NSWCCA 35; (2008) 72 NSWLR 85 R v Halmi [2005] NSWCCA 2; (2005) 62 NSWLR 263 R v Janceski [2005] NSWCCA 281; (2005) 64 NSWLR 10 Rockdale Beef Pty Ltd v Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales [2007] NSWCA 128; (2007) 165 IR 7 Texts Cited: The Macquarie Dictionary (1982) The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary, 3rd ed (1973) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Attorney General of New South Wales (Appellant) Built NSW Pty Ltd (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: J V Agius SC, B G Docking and D B O'Neil (on behalf of the Attorney General of New South Wales) B Walker SC and R Ranken (Respondent) Solicitors: WorkCover Authority of NSW (Attorney General of New South Wales) Norton Rose Fulbright (Respondent) File Number(s): 2012/171786 2012/171817 Publication restriction: No Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9101 Date of Decision: 2012-11-29 00:00:00 Before: Curtis DCJ File Number(s): 2012/171786 2012/171817
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate