NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Keulemans v Attorney-General, New South Wales [2013] NSWSC 1772 Hearing dates: 4 September 2013 Decision date: 02 December 2013 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: White J Decision: Counsel for the plaintiff to bring in short minutes of order consistent with these reasons. Catchwords: SUCCESSION - wills, probate and administration - construction of will - whether will should be construed to qualify type of "foundation or trust" to be established - rectification of will - whether will reflects intentions of testator - difficulty formulating with precision testator's instructions to solicitor drafting will PROCEDURE - costs - costs of parties to be paid out of estate - where litigation is with respect to a particular gift in the will - whether burden of costs should be born by that gift Legislation Cited: Charitable Trusts Act 1993 Succession Act 2006 Probate and Administration Act 1898 Civil Procedure Act 2005 Trustee Act 1925 Cases Cited: Attorney-General v Donnelly (1958) 98 CLR 538 Public Trustee v Attorney-General of NSW (1997) 42 NSWLR 600 ANZ Trustees Limited v Hamlet [2010] VSC 207 Lockrey v Ferris [2011] NSWSC 179 Perrin v Morgan [1943] AC 399 Hatzantonis v Lawrence [2003] NSWSC 914 Public Trustee v Herbert [2009] NSWSC 366 Leader v Duffey (1888) 13 App Cas 294 Ward v Brown [1916] 2 AC 121 Kirby-Smith v Parnell [1903] 1 Ch 483 Fell v Fell (1922) 31 CLR 268 Coorey v George (Powell J, 27 February 1986, unreported; BC8601222) Perpetual Trustee Co Limited v Wright (1987) 9 NSWLR 18 Fairbairn v Varvaressos (2010) 78 NSWLR 577 Rawack v Spicer [2002] NSWSC 849 In Re Stone; Read v Dubua (1936) 36 SR (NSW) 508 Pohlner v Pfeiffer (1964) 112 CLR 52 Re Buckton; Buckton v Buckton [1907] 2 Ch 406 Murdocca v Murdocca (No. 2) [2002] NSWSC 505 Moran v House (1924) 35 CLR 60 Ledgerwood v Perpetual Trustee Company Limited (No. 2) (Young J, Supreme Court of New South Wales, 25 August 1997, unreported; BC9704806) Perpetual Trustee Co Limited v Paling (1924) 25 SR (NSW) 56 Kostka v Ukrainian Council of NSW Inc [2013] NSWSC 222 Texts Cited: Theobald on Wills, Sweet and Maxwell, 17th ed 2010 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Hendrik Jan Keulemans (Plaintiff) Attorney-General, New South Wales (Defendant) Lorna May Nicholl (2nd Defendant) Representation: Counsel: G O Blake SC with S K Hill (Plaintiff) A Hochroth (1st Defendant) L Ellison SC (2nd Defendant) Solicitors: CBD Law (Plaintiff) Crown Solicitor (1st Defendant) Cooney Harvey Doney (2nd Defendant) File Number(s): 2012/390933
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate